103 F. 3d 119 - Peterson v. R Anderson
103 F3d 119 Peterson v. R Anderson
103 F.3d 119
Raymond PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Alton R. ANDERSON; John Williams; D.C. Kingsbury,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-7144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 7, 1996.
Decided: Nov. 20, 1996.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Raymond Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peterson v. Anderson, No. CA-95-320-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. July 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.